Rain Lag

The Analog Incident Storyboard Wall: Drawing Your Next Outage Before It Happens

How to use an “analog storyboard wall” to design dynamic, SRE-style incident response workflows that adapt over time, leverage automation, and turn outages into a competitive advantage.

The Analog Incident Storyboard Wall: Drawing Your Next Outage Before It Happens

Modern systems fail in weird, nonlinear ways. Microservices, third-party APIs, complex data pipelines, and AI-driven components all interact in ways we don’t fully understand—until something breaks.

Many teams try to fix this with more tools: more dashboards, more alerts, more chat channels, more runbooks. But what they really lack is a shared mental model of what happens during an incident, from the first signal to the last postmortem action.

That’s where an Analog Incident Storyboard Wall comes in.

Think of it as a physical (or virtual) wall covered with sticky notes and sketches that visually map out how your next outage will unfold—before it ever happens. It’s low-tech on purpose: you’re designing workflows, not wiring up yet another tool.

In this post, we’ll explore how to use an incident storyboard wall to:

  • Build a dynamic, adaptive incident response practice
  • Leverage automation and analytics where they actually help humans
  • Treat incidents as learning opportunities, not just failures
  • Apply SRE-style structure from detection to postmortem
  • Turn incident response into a competitive advantage
  • Design workflows from multiple role-based personas (on-call, customer, executive, etc.)

Why an Analog Wall in a Digital World?

An incident storyboard wall is intentionally simple:

  • Sticky notes or index cards
  • Markers, tape, and string
  • A wall, whiteboard, or large virtual canvas (Miro, FigJam, Lucidspark)

You draw the story of an outage: the signals, decisions, handoffs, blind spots, and recovery paths. You annotate where automation kicks in, where humans get confused, where customers feel pain.

Why analog works so well here:

  • Fast to change – You can rearrange steps in seconds without code, config, or approvals.
  • Shared understanding – Everyone can see the big picture at once, not in 10 different dashboards.
  • Low friction – People talk more freely when they’re pointing at sticky notes, not defending a tool.
  • System-agnostic – You’re designing how you work, not which tool you buy.

The result: a living storyboard that becomes the blueprint for how your real incident tooling and processes should behave.


Step 1: Start With a Dynamic, Adaptive Mindset

Static runbooks and rigid playbooks break down as systems evolve. Your incident response has to be as dynamic as your architecture and threat landscape.

On your storyboard wall, avoid designing a single “perfect” process. Instead, assume:

  • Your services, dependencies, and traffic patterns will change.
  • Your threat model (attacks, failures, misconfigurations) will evolve.
  • Your team composition and skills will shift.

Reflect that with:

  • Branching paths: What if the primary responder is unavailable? What if the monitoring system is down? What if the incident spans multiple regions?
  • Versioning: Add labels like Incident Flow v1.2 – last updated after Q1 outage. Expect to revise after major incidents.
  • Feedback loops: Add explicit “Learn and update storyboard” steps to your postmortems. Your wall is never done.

Dynamic incident response isn’t a process you document once—it’s a behavior you practice continuously.


Step 2: Map the End-to-End Incident Journey

Now, sketch the full lifecycle of an incident, SRE-style, from signal to learning:

  1. Detection
    • Alerts fire, dashboards spike, anomaly detection triggers, or a customer reports an issue.
  2. Triage
    • On-call confirms it’s real, assesses severity/impact, and starts the incident.
  3. Coordination
    • Communication channels open, roles are assigned, stakeholders are notified.
  4. Diagnosis
    • Hypotheses, queries, logs, metrics, traces, reproductions.
  5. Mitigation
    • Rollbacks, feature flags, failover, rate limiting, circuit breakers.
  6. Resolution
    • Systems stable, user impact ended, monitoring back to normal.
  7. Communication & Closure
    • Status pages updated, incident declared resolved, stakeholders informed.
  8. Postmortem & Follow-Through
    • Root cause analysis (or better: contributing factors), action items, learnings, process improvements.

Put each stage on the wall. Then fill in what actually happens in your org when, say, a critical payment API goes down at 02:00.

You’re not dreaming up ideals yet—you’re drawing reality.


Step 3: Layer in Personas and Role-Based Viewpoints

Effective incident response must work for all the humans involved, not just the on-call engineer.

Add swimlanes or color-coding to your storyboard for key personas:

  • On-Call Engineer – “What wakes me up? What do I see first? Where do I click? What decisions am I forced to make half-asleep?”
  • Incident Commander / SRE – “How do I coordinate people? How do I know who’s doing what? How do I prevent chaos in chat?”
  • Customer – “When do I first notice? What do I see? How confusing or clear are the messages I get?”
  • Executive / Business Stakeholder – “How quickly do I get context? Do I see business impact, not CPU graphs?”
  • Support / Customer Success – “What can I tell customers? Where do I get trustworthy, up-to-date info?”

For each stage of the incident timeline, ask:

  • What does each persona see?
  • What do they need to know or do?
  • Where are they currently blocked, confused, or overloaded?

This is where hidden friction becomes visible. Maybe on-call engineers have good tooling, but support is improvising every incident. Or executives overload the on-call because there’s no clear, push-based status feed.

Designing from personas ensures you’re optimizing for real-world needs, not just technical elegance.


Step 4: Identify Where Automation and Analytics Actually Help

With the journey and personas visible, mark spots where:

  • Humans are doing repetitive, deterministic tasks.
  • Decisions are made with data you already have.
  • Time is wasted on manual lookups, pings, and copy-paste.

Then, explicitly label opportunities to:

  1. Detect issues earlier

    • Better alert thresholds, anomaly detection, SLO-based alerts.
    • Analytics that correlate logs/metrics/traces to spot trouble faster.
  2. Streamline response actions

    • One-click runbooks to restart services, roll back, or toggle feature flags.
    • Automatic channel creation, role assignment, and incident ticket creation when an alert crosses a threshold.
  3. Shorten incident duration

    • Automated triage: “Is this isolated to region X?” or “Is this a known error signature?”
    • Pre-generated dashboards and queries attached to the incident as soon as it’s declared.

Crucially: automation should support humans, not replace them. Use your storyboard annotations to sanity-check:

  • Are we automating the right steps, at the right time, for the right persona?
  • Is there a clear, documented escape hatch when automation misfires?

Over time, your storyboard becomes the design spec for targeted automation rather than a random collection of scripts.


Step 5: Make Every Incident a Learning Opportunity

Treat outages not as embarrassments to hide, but as data points in how your system and organization behave under stress.

Extend your storyboard beyond resolution:

  • Add a Postmortem lane with steps like:

    • Collect timeline (from chat, tickets, tooling).
    • Identify contributing factors (technical, process, organizational).
    • Capture what surprised you: “We didn’t expect X to fail when Y did.”
    • Turn surprises into resilience work: tests, alerts, design changes, documentation.
  • Add a final step: "Update the Storyboard".

    • Did this incident reveal a missing step? Add it.
    • Did a workaround become a standard pattern? Promote it.
    • Did a persona suffer (e.g., customers got confusing messages)? Redesign that slice of the journey.

This is how your wall becomes a living model of your real incident response, not just a poster.

Over time, you’ll see patterns:

  • Repeated failure modes that suggest deeper architectural work.
  • Common communication breakdowns that suggest new roles or rituals.
  • Opportunities to clarify ownership and reduce “who’s on this?” chaos.

Each of these patterns can be converted into durable improvements: design changes, SLOs, playbooks, org changes.


Step 6: Turn Incident Management into a Competitive Advantage

Most companies treat incidents as embarrassing setbacks. High-performing teams treat them as accelerants:

  • They identify weak points before they become company-level crises.
  • They practice response so often that when big incidents hit, they look almost routine.
  • They continuously refine their incident storyboards and tooling so new hires ramp quickly.

On your storyboard wall, make this explicit:

  • Tag steps that correlate most with MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) and customer impact.
  • Focus improvement work there first.
  • Track which process or automation changes came from which incidents.

When leadership asks, “What did we get in return for last quarter’s outages?” you can point at:

  • Reduced response times on similar incidents.
  • Fewer customer-facing disruptions for the same failure types.
  • Clear, reusable patterns that make the org faster and calmer under stress.

That’s how incident management shifts from cost center to competitive advantage.


Making It Real: A Simple Starter Workshop

You can get started with an Analog Incident Storyboard Wall in half a day:

  1. Pick one memorable incident from the last 6–12 months.
  2. Invite a cross-functional group: SREs, devs, support, product, maybe one exec.
  3. Draw the timeline on the wall using stages (Detection → Postmortem).
  4. Add persona swimlanes and fill in who did what, when, and how they felt.
  5. Circle friction points and surprises in red.
  6. Mark automation and analytics opportunities in another color.
  7. Document 3–5 concrete improvements you’ll make this quarter.
  8. Schedule a follow-up after your next major incident to update the wall.

Keep photos or a virtual clone of the wall. Over time, you’ll see it evolve from “what happened” to “how we intentionally handle what will happen next.”


Conclusion: Draw the Future Before It Breaks

Complex systems fail in complex ways, but your response doesn’t have to be chaotic. An Analog Incident Storyboard Wall gives your team a shared, evolving picture of:

  • How incidents unfold end-to-end
  • What each persona experiences and needs
  • Where automation and analytics can genuinely help
  • How to turn every outage into a source of resilience

By designing your next outage before it happens—on a wall, with pens, tape, and real conversations—you create an incident management practice that is dynamic, humane, and continuously improving.

In a world where outages are inevitable, how you respond is up to you. The storyboard wall is where that response gets designed on purpose, not in the heat of the moment.

The Analog Incident Storyboard Wall: Drawing Your Next Outage Before It Happens | Rain Lag